Compare
AdverseMe compared with enterprise screening platforms
A plain comparison of what you get. No competitor is named; the enterprise column describes the category as it is commonly sold.
AdverseMe gives a small compliance team what enterprise screening platforms sell on annual contracts: 117 sources including 5 GCC and MENA lists, 4 independent AI judges with reproducible scores, an ownership graph to depth 6, a REST API and batch CSV, from $49 a month on a monthly plan you can cancel at any time.
- Sources
- 117
- GCC and MENA lists
- 5, parsed daily
- AI judges
- 4, scored blind
- From
- $49 a month
Side by side
| Area | AdverseMe | Enterprise screening platforms |
|---|---|---|
| Coverage | 117 integrated sources, browsable in the app. 13 official sanctions feeds snapshotted twice a day. 5 GCC and MENA national terror lists parsed from the issuing authority's file daily, with Arabic transliteration. | Broad global list coverage. Regional lists for the Gulf and North Africa are often aggregated through a third party rather than parsed from the source, and the full source list is rarely published. |
| Explainability | Engine Trace lists every source searched, what came back, and which matches were dropped as the wrong entity. Each finding shows every judge's score and reasoning, in the app and in the PDF. | A match score and a list of hits. The reasoning behind a score is usually a single model or rule set, and dropped candidates are rarely visible. |
| Determinism | 4 judges from 4 model families score at temperature zero with fixed seeds. The median is the score, dissent is counted, and the same evidence returns the same score within a 14-day window. | AI-assisted scoring, where offered, is typically a single model whose output can change between runs. Reproducing a past score is not always possible. |
| Ownership | Ownership graph to depth 6 with GLEIF LEI and SEC 13D and 13G edges. The OFAC 50 percent rule is computed across the chain. Inferred edges are drawn dashed, never presented as registry fact. | Ownership data is often a separate module or a separate price. The 50 percent rule may need to be worked out by the analyst. |
| API | Public REST API with an X-API-Key on every plan: screen, fetch a result, download the PDF, list screenings, check credits. Webhooks push results when a screening finishes. | API access is common but often gated to higher tiers or priced separately, with an integration project before the first call. |
| Batch | Upload a CSV, watch each row screen with live progress, download the results, escalate hits to cases. Included on every plan. | Bulk screening is usually available, sometimes as a scheduled job rather than an interactive upload. |
| Price | From $49 a month for 50 screenings, up to $399 for 1,500. 1 credit per screening, PDF reports free, monitoring delta checks free. Monthly plans, cancel any time. | Quoted per seat or per volume, usually on an annual contract with a minimum commitment and an onboarding fee. Pricing is rarely published. |
The enterprise column is a general description of the category, not a statement about any specific vendor. AdverseMe figures come from the running product.
Who this comparison is for
Enterprise screening platforms are built for banks with a procurement department. They are good at what they do, and they are priced and contracted for that buyer. A compliance team of two at a law firm, a real estate brokerage in the UAE or a payments start-up has the same obligations and none of the budget.
AdverseMe was built for that team. Every plan includes every feature, the source list is published inside the app, and every screening comes with its working: which sources were searched, what each judge said, and why a candidate match was dropped. The price is on the pricing page, not in a quote.
Where an enterprise platform has an advantage, it is usually in depth of manual research services and in contractual support commitments. AdverseMe does not offer research analysts or negotiated service levels. It offers the screening engine, the audit trail and the report, at a monthly price.
What you give up, honestly
- No managed research team. The judges and the Engine Trace replace the analyst memo, but a human review is still yours to do.
- No negotiated service levels. Plans are monthly and self-serve.
- Sources are integrated one at a time and listed in the app. If a source you need is not on the coverage page, it is not in the product.
See the working for yourself.
Plans from $49 a month for 50 screenings. Every feature on every plan, cancel any time.